2024-03-28T15:52:23Z
https://journals.psychopen.eu/index.php/index/oai
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8605
2022-04-06T12:57:51Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8607
2022-04-06T12:57:56Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8609
2022-04-06T12:58:01Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8611
2022-04-06T12:58:06Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8629
2022-04-06T13:05:15Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8631
2022-04-06T13:05:20Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8633
2022-04-06T13:05:25Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8635
2022-04-06T13:05:30Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8653
2022-04-06T13:09:20Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8655
2022-04-06T13:09:24Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8657
2022-04-06T13:09:29Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8659
2022-04-06T13:09:34Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8673
2022-04-06T13:12:09Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8675
2022-04-06T13:12:14Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8677
2022-04-06T13:12:19Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8679
2022-04-06T13:12:23Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8693
2022-04-06T13:14:03Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8695
2022-04-06T13:14:07Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8697
2022-04-06T13:14:12Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8699
2022-04-06T13:14:16Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8723
2022-04-06T13:17:53Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8725
2022-04-06T13:18:00Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8727
2022-04-06T13:18:06Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8729
2022-04-06T13:18:10Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8747
2022-04-06T13:45:39Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8749
2022-04-06T13:45:45Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8751
2022-04-06T13:45:59Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8753
2022-04-08T09:17:50Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8773
2022-04-06T13:53:24Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8775
2022-04-06T13:53:28Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8777
2022-04-06T13:53:33Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8795
2022-04-06T13:55:19Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8797
2022-04-06T13:55:23Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8799
2022-04-06T13:55:28Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8817
2022-04-06T14:06:30Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8819
2022-04-06T14:06:34Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8821
2022-04-06T14:06:38Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8841
2022-04-07T08:26:48Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8843
2022-04-07T08:26:53Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8845
2022-04-07T08:26:58Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8855
2022-04-07T09:39:42Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8857
2022-04-07T09:40:41Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8859
2022-04-07T09:40:48Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8875
2022-04-07T09:47:36Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8877
2022-04-07T09:47:52Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8879
2022-04-07T09:48:00Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8891
2022-04-07T09:58:21Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8893
2022-04-07T09:58:26Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8895
2022-04-07T09:58:35Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8909
2022-04-07T10:03:37Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8911
2022-04-07T10:03:42Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8913
2022-04-07T10:03:47Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8945
2022-04-07T10:08:45Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8947
2022-04-07T10:09:51Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8949
2022-04-07T10:09:40Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8951
2022-04-07T10:09:33Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8985
2022-04-07T10:21:59Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8987
2022-04-07T10:22:11Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/8989
2022-04-07T10:22:23Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9019
2022-04-07T10:27:12Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9021
2022-04-07T10:27:23Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9023
2022-04-07T10:27:32Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9041
2022-04-07T10:34:31Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9043
2022-04-07T10:34:39Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9045
2022-04-07T10:34:48Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9067
2022-04-07T10:38:06Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9069
2022-04-07T10:38:33Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9071
2022-04-07T10:38:41Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9117
2022-04-07T10:45:27Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9123
2022-04-07T10:48:57Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9125
2022-04-07T10:49:03Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9127
2022-04-07T10:50:08Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9139
2022-04-07T10:56:08Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9141
2022-04-07T10:56:13Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9143
2022-04-07T10:56:17Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9149
2022-04-07T10:58:31Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9151
2022-04-07T10:58:34Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9153
2022-04-07T10:58:39Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9165
2022-04-07T11:00:50Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9167
2022-04-07T11:00:54Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9169
2022-04-07T11:00:59Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9177
2022-04-07T11:05:05Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9179
2022-04-07T11:05:09Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9181
2022-04-07T11:05:13Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9193
2022-03-24T13:21:09Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9195
2022-03-24T13:21:13Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/9197
2022-03-24T13:21:17Z
bioling:BIO
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/101
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:ED
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/101
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 1-7
Evidence-based ethical problem solving to guide practise in psychology research
Ranjbar, Vania ; The University of Edinburgh
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/101
en
Looking back to the World War II activities, undertaken in the name of research, there is little room for doubt as to why we have Ethics Committees (ECs; or Institutional Review Boards, IRBs, as they are referred to in the U.S.) and various ethical codes of conduct. On one hand, no contemporary scientist would deny the need for a peer review process to ensure ethical treatment and protection of human research subjects, especially in psychology research. On the other hand, anecdotal evidence of ECs becoming an impediment to scientists and their research is mounting up (Ceci & Bruck, 2009; Fiske, 2009; Sieber, 2009; Tully, Ninis, Booy, & Viner, 2000); albeit empirical data on the issue is lacking (Ceci & Bruck, 2009; Fiske, 2009). There appears, however, to be a general sense in the academic world that this impediment sometimes arises as a result of EC members' lack of awareness or understanding of the particular research topic under review and its associated literature and methodologies, including what may constitute contemporary best practise in the area. This may then give rise to competing ethical concerns, between EC members and their department colleagues. Members of psychology ECs are not, and could not possibly be, experts on all psychological topics and methodologies.
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/102
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:INT
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/102
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 8-16
On the study of culture and mind: Interview with Prof. Michael Cole
Glăveanu, Vlad; EJOP Editor
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/102
en
Culture and mind represent, in themselves, perhaps the two most complicated phenomena to ever be studied. Their massive complexity has posed, for centuries, great challenges to researchers from a variety of fields. It is therefore all the more difficult to understand the interconnection between the two. And yet, as Professor Michael Cole and, more broadly, cultural psychologists would argue: there is no way of making sense of one if we disregard the other. Culture and mind constitute each other through action and communication and it is their intricate relationship that holds the key to understanding human nature and human society. Professor Cole, one of the pioneers of cultural psychology, discusses in this interview the theoretical and methodological difficulties that have shaped his work for several decades, a work accompanied at times by great frustrations but also remarkable rewards. For it is in studying culture and mind, rather than culture or mind, that we can come not only to appreciate development but find ways to actively and efficiently support it.
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/103
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:RES
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/103
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 17-39
Job demands, job control, social support and self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of burnout among physical education teachers
Brouwers, André; The Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands
Tomic, Welko; The Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands
Boluijt, Huibrecht; The Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/103
en
The aim of the present study, which involved 311 Physical Education (PE) teachers in Dutch schools, was to examine the relationships between job demands, job control, social support and perceived self-efficacy on the one hand and teacher burnout on the other. Based on Karasek’s Demands-Control-Support model (1990), it was expected that perceived stringent job demands in combination with perceived lack of control on the job and perceived lack of social support from colleagues, principals and managers could so affect teachers’ health that they were likely to suffer from enhanced levels of burnout. Our study partly confirmed results based on the Karasek model. It was also expected that the number of domain-determined self-efficacy beliefs concerning the influence teachers had on job demands would affect their level of burnout. However, this supposition was not supported. Perceived job control was found to have a moderating effect on the relationship between perceived job demands on the one hand and the emotional exhaustion and depersonalization dimensions of burnout on the other. Colleague support had a moderating effect on the relationship between job demands and the personal accomplishment dimension of burnout, whereas managerial support had a moderating effect on self-efficacy beliefs concerning teachers’ influence on job demands and personal accomplishment. The study further revealed that PE teachers run a greater risk of falling victim to burnout as they grow older. Implications for future studies are discussed.
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/104
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:RES
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/104
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 40-61
Talking about traumatic events: A cross-cultural investigation
Freitag, Simone; Department Health & Prevention, Institute of Psychology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University, Greifswald
Grimm, Anna; Department of Health and Prevention, Institute of Psychology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany
Schmidt, Silke; Department Health & Prevention, Institute of Psychology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/104
en
Individuals are facing traumatic situations like natural crises (like floods, earthquakes) and man-made disasters (terroristic attacks) incrementally. Traumatic events are related to psychological consequences for survivors (depression, posttraumatic stress disorder). The experience of a traumatic event can be disclosed through narratives, which can be linguistically analyzed with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC). In this study, cultural and temporal differences in narratives about different traumatic events in seven European countries are investigated. 132 survivors, who experienced a traumatic situation, reported their experiences in focus groups and interviews. The transcripts of narratives were analyzed with the LIWC2007 (Pennebaker, Chung, Ireland, Gonzales & Booth, 2007). Regarding the LIWC categories affective and cognitive processes, event characteristics as well as cultural and temporal differences were explored. Results show that traumatic situations are reported with a greater amount of negative emotion words. Cultural differences regarding the LIWC categories are found between the seven European countries. A temporal factor, considering days elapsed between an event and narrative, was investigated. Temporal differences in cognitive word use, but not for affective contents, were recognized. This study was able to show tendencies of cultural diversity in the expression of traumatic events in survivors of seven European countries as well as to explore a temporal factor, which is related to a retrospective way of narration.
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/105
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:RES
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/105
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 62-80
An investigation of the effective factors on students´ motivational beliefs: The case of Iranian students
Taheri, Zhaleh; University of Allameh Tabatabaie
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/105
en
This study explored the effective factors on students’ motivational beliefs (familial, individual, academic and environmental) among Iranian students. The data are derived from a survey using a standard questionnaire with adequate validity and reliability. The participants of the study were selected from high school students in Tehran (total = 518; female = 293 (56.6%) and male = 225 (43.4%)) through random sampling and within the age group of 15-18 in May 2010. The data was analyzed with the help of Independent Sample Tests, Pearson Correlations and Multiple Regressions. The results revealed that there is a significant relationship between the above mentioned factors and students' motivational beliefs. The effective factors, in the order of their importance are: environmental factors, individual factors and academic factors. It was observed that familial factors do not have a significant effect on students' motivational beliefs; however this result was different between male and female participants.
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/106
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:RES
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/106
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 81-98
Hospital restructuring and downsizing: Effects on nursing staff well-being and perceived hospital functioning
Burke, Ronald J.; York University, Toronto, Canada
Ng, Eddy W. S.; Dalhousie University
Wolpin, Jacob; Independent Consultant, Toronto, Canada
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/106
en
The health care system, and hospitals, underwent considerable restructuring and downsizing in the early to mid-1900s in several countries as governments cut costs to reduce their budget deficits. Studies of the effects of these efforts on nursing staff and hospital functioning in various countries generally reported negative impacts. Health care restructuring and hospital downsizing was again being implemented in North America in 2009/2010 as governments struggled to once again reduce deficits at a time of worldwide economic recession. This study examines the relationship of downsizing and restructuring efforts with work and well-being outcomes. Data were collected from over 289 nursing staff working in California hospitals in 2009/2010. This research considers the relationship of number of hospital restructuring initiatives reported by nursing staff with indicators of their work satisfaction and psychological well-being and their perceptions of the impact of these initiatives on aspects of hospital performance. Nurses reported a relatively large number of restructuring and downsizing initiatives during the preceding year. Consistent with findings reported over 15 years ago, nursing staff reporting a greater number of restructuring and downsizing initiatives indicated less favorable work and well-being outcomes and more negative effects on hospital functioning. Some suggestions for more successful approaches to cost reductions are offered.
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/107
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:RES
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/107
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 99-111
Effect of perceived inequality and perceived job insecurity on fraudulent intent of bank employees in Nigeria
Benjamin, Owolabi Ademola; University of Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
Samson, Babalola Sunday; University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/107
en
This paper examines the effect of perceived inequality and perceived job insecurity on fraudulent intent of bank employees in Nigeria. A total of 170 participants were used for the study. They were selected from five branches of commercial banks in Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti state, Nigeria. Perceived inequality was measured using the perceived inequality in work scale (Corey and Keyes, 1998), while perceived job insecurity was measured using the job insecurity scale (Ashford et al., 1980). Fraudulent intent was measured using a self developed scale. Results reveal that perceived inequality and perceived job insecurity have a significant effect on employee fraudulent intent.
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/108
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:RES
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/108
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 112-142
The relation of positive emotions to post partum depression
Moraitou, Martha; Associate Professor, Department of Midwifery, Alexandreio Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, Greece
Galanakis, Michalis; Panteio University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece
Stalikas, Anastasios; Associate Professor, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece
Garivaldis, Filia Joanne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/108
en
Positive emotions have been implicated in the development of coping resources and resilience for psychological health across various significant life events. Childbirth is often an event that incites positive emotions in a woman, and it may be that such emotions have an immobilizing effect on the onset of post natal depressive symptoms. In efforts to examine the influence of positive emotions on women during their transition into motherhood, the present study assessed 195 women across two stages: before and after childbirth. The aim of the study was to examine the variety of positive emotions that arise from childbirth, the relationship of positive emotions that arise from childbirth to maternity and other demographic variables and the relation between positive emotions that arise from childbirth and depressive post natal symptoms. Results revealed a significant manifestation of specific positive emotions such as joyfulness, pride, and interest after childbirth. Participants between the ages of 30 and 34 experienced a greater variety and intensity of positive emotions before and after. In turn, a negative relationship was found between the experience of positive emotion intensity and post natal depressive symptomatology. Factors such as education level, whether the birth was planned or not, and environmental and partner support were found to relate significantly to the manifestation of positive emotions.
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/109
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:RES
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/109
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 143-163
Predicting the intention to quit smoking: A comparative study among Spanish and Norwegian students
Rise, Jostein; Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research, Oslo, Norway
Ommundsen, Reidar; Department of Psychology, University of Oslo
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/109
en
The purpose of the present study was to explore the role of an extended version of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) in predicting intentions to quit smoking among Norwegian smoking students (N=211) and Spanish students (N=205). As hypothesised, subjective norm predicted quitting intentions more strongly in Spain (a collectivistic culture) than in Norway (an individualistic culture). Group identity predicted quitting intentions more strongly in Norway than in Spain. Consistent with the predictions the predictive role of self-identity and moral norm did not differ between the countries. Self-identity did not predict intention significantly, while this was the case for moral norm. Thus the study provided evidence of the moderating role of culture in the TPB, and indications of a stronger conflict between smokers and non-smokers in countries with high level of regulatory anti-smoking measures.
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/110
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:CONT
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/110
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 164-186
Womb envy and Western society: On the devaluation of nurturing in psychotherapy and society
Semmelhack, Diana; Midwestern University
Ende, Larry; Psychotherapist
Farrell, Karen; Midwestern University
Pojas, Julieanne; Midwestern University
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/110
en
Our purposes in part I of the essay are: 1) to suggest that womb envy has been a significant element in the formation of our culture (in the context of the traditions of Judaism, Roman Catholicism, and Islam), and 2) to make more evident the presence and the significance of the devaluation of nurturing in our society, in part by linking this devaluation of nurturing to its history in the phenomenon of womb envy. In part II, we look at how the devaluation of nurturing is manifested in the practice of psychodynamic therapy. The devaluation of nurturance is thus viewed in a context where the writers have intimate knowledge and experience. We find that a downplaying of the significance of nurturing in our society results in a general lack of empathy and sensitivity, and a deemphasis on relational competence, as well as an overall devaluing of women. An emphasis on profit and production moves relational concerns into the background. In the context of psychotherapy, we suggest, our society’s emphasis on hierarchy and authority interferes with nurturing as a therapeutic factor. We also discuss various attempts that writers have made to support the role of nurturing in psychotherapy.
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/111
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:LITREV
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/111
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 187-197
Spirituality, religion, and health: Reflections and issues
Hussain, Dilwar; Thapar University, Patiala, Punjab
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/111
en
The past decade has witnessed substantial growth in the study of religiosity/spirituality and its relationship with various indicators of health. Most of these studies found positive relationships between religion, spirituality and health (both mental and physical health). However, various studies in this field are criticized specially for not clearly and operationally defining the constructs religion and spirituality and for their poor design. This paper discuses major issue associated with concepts, norms, and assessments of religiosity and spirituality. Finally, various suggestions to surpass these limitations are also addressed.
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/112
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:BOOKREV
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/112
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 198-200
Brain, Mind and Behaviour: A New Perspective on Human Nature
Virk, Daljinder; EJOP Associate Editor
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/112
en
2nd edition Authored by David L. Robinson Pontoon Publications, 2009 Brain, Mind and Behaviour describes new discoveries concerning the relationship between brain-function and individual differences in human personality and intelligence. These new findings along with related theoretical developments provide new insights concerning the greatest mystery of all: human nature and the human mind.The book will be of great interest to those who wish to know more about human nature, especially psychologists and those concerned with the psychological significance of neuroscience. It is an essential reading for undergraduate and postgraduate psychology students with a main interest in personality and individual differences and for those psychologists who are professionally concerned with mental health, education, human resource management and areas where knowledge of personality and individual differences is of primary and fundamental importance.
oai:journals.psychopen.eu:article/113
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
ejop:BOOKREV
v2
https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/113
2020-08-28T13:49:16Z
Europe’s Journal of Psychology
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2011); 201-203
Living confidently with HIV: A Self-Help Book for People Living with HIV
Virk, Daljinder; EJOP Associate Editor
2011-02-27 00:00:00
Authors who publish with Europe's Journal of Psychology (EJOP) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in EJOP in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of EJOP are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, EJOP as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by EJOP.
Authors grant EJOP the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
url:https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/113
en
2nd edition Authored by Liz Shaw, Erasmo Tacconelli, Robert Watson, and Claudia Herbert Blue Stallion Publications, 2009 Living confidently with HIV: A Self-Help Book for People Living with HIV has been written by a team of clinical psychologists who have extensive experience in working with patients who have been diagnosed with and are coming to terms with their diagnosis of being HIV positive. Consultant Clinical psychologist Liz Shaw focuses on improving the lives of people with HIV and provides them with positive ways of coping and this certainly resonates throughout the entire book. Erasmo Tacconelli, a Chartered Clinical Psychologist, ensures that his patients feel empowered in coping with stigma and discrimination; this too is resonated throughout the book. Robert Watson is a Chartered Clinical Psychologist whose clinical techniques stem from cognitive behavioural therapy, systemic therapy and cognitive-analytic therapy. His focus is very similar to that of Erasmo but also ensures those who are affected have a good quality of life. Finally, Dr Claudia Herbert, a Chartered Consultant Clinical Psychologist, specialises in trauma psychology. Claudia Herbert ensures that she can help people adjust to their HIV diagnosis and live their lives well, confidently and enriched despite or possibly because of their chronic condition.
c174d0b22b4acf8c77d546d1ce99b490